Neurons result from a highly complex and unique series of cell divisions. For example, in fruit flies, the process starts with stem cells that divide into mother cells (progenitor cells), which then divide into precursor cells that eventually become neurons.
A team from the University of Michigan, spearheaded by graduate student Nigel Michki and assistant professor Dawen Cai, Ph.D., in the departments of Biophysics and Cell and Developmental Biology at the U-M Medical School, have identified many genes that are important in fruit flies’ neuron development, and that had never been described before in that context.
Since many genes are conserved across species including between fruit flies (Drosophila), mice, and humans, what is learnt in flies can also serve as a model to better understand other species, including humans.
“Now that we know which genes are involved in this form of neurogenesis in flies, we can look for them in other species and test for them. We work on a multitude of organisms at U-M and we’ve the potential to interrogate across organisms,” explains Michki. “In my opinion, the work we did is one of the many pieces that will inform other work that will inform disease,” adds Michki. “This is why we do foundational research like this one.”
Flies are also commonly used in many different types of research that might benefit from having a more comprehensive list of the fly genes with their associated roles in neuron cell development.
Neurons are made from stem cells that massively multiply before becoming neurons. In the human brain, the process is extremely complex, involving billions of cells. In the fly brain, the process is much simpler, with around 200 stem cells for the entire brain. The smaller scale allows for a fine analysis of the neuronal cell division process from start to finish.
In flies, when the stem cell divides, it yields another stem cell and a progenitor cell. When this last one divides, it makes a so-called precursor cell that divides only once and gives rise to two neurons. Genes control this production process by telling the cells either to divide —and which particular type of cell to produce— or to stop dividing.
To this day, only a few of the genes that control this neuron development process have been identified and in this publication in Cell Reports, the scientists have characterized many more genes involved. Along the timeline of the neuron development process, the U-M team could precisely record which genes were involved and for how long.
In particular, at the progenitors’ stage, the scientists identified three genes that are important at this stage for defining what ‘kind’ of neuron each progenitor will make; these particular genes had never been described before in this context. They also validated previously known marker genes that are known to regulate the cell reproduction process.
When they applied their analysis technique to the other phases of the neuron development process, they also recorded the expression of additional genes. However, it is still unknown why these genes go up in expression at different steps of the neuron development process and what role they actually play in these different steps.
“Now that many candidate genes are identified, we are investigating the roles they play in the neuron maturation and fate determination process,” says Cai. “We are also excited to explore other developmental time points to illustrate the dynamic changes of the molecular landscape in the fly brain.”
“This work provides rich information on how to program stem cell progeny into distinct neuron types as well as how to trans-differentiate non-neuronal cell types into neurons. These findings will have a significant impact on the understanding of the normal brain development as well as on neuron regeneration medicine,” adds Cheng-Yu Lee, PhD professor in the U-M Life Sciences Institute who collaborated with the Cai Lab.
This study is mostly based on high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing techniques. The scientists took single cells from fruit flies’ brains and sequenced the RNA, generating hundreds of gigabytes of data in only one day. From the RNA sequences, they could determine the developmental stage of each neuron. “We now have a very good understanding of how this process goes at the RNA level,” says Michki.
The team also used traditional microscope observations to localize where these different RNAs are being expressed in the brain.
“Combining in silico analysis and in situ exploration not only validates the quality of our sequencing results but also restores the spatial and temporal relationship of the candidate genes, which is lost in the single-cell dissociation process,” says Cai.
At the beginning of their study, the scientists analyzed the large data set with open-source software. Later, they developed a portal, called MiCV, that eases the use of existing computer services and allows to test for repeatability.
This portal can be utilized for cell and gene data analysis from a variety of organs and does not require computer programming experience.
“Tools like MiCV can be very powerful for researchers who are doing this type of research for the first time and who want to quickly generate new hypotheses from their data,” says Michki. “It saves a lot of time for data analysis, as well as expenses on consultant fees. The ultimate goal is to allow scientists to focus more on their research rather than on sometimes daunting data analysis tools.”